最新のISO-9001-Lead-Auditor問題集で試験を準備する

Scenario 7: POLKA is a car manufacturing company based in Stockholm, Sweden. The company has around
14,000 employees working in different sectors which help with the design, painting, assembling, and test drives of the final product. The company is widely known for its qualitative products and affordable prices. In order to retain their reputation, POLKA implemented a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO
9001.
Before applying for certification, the company decided to conduct an internal audit to check whether there are any nonconformities in their QMS and if the requirements of ISO 9001 are being fulfilled. The top management appointed Sean, the internal auditor, as the team leader of the internal audit team. Sean required from the top management to have unrestricted access to the employees and executives of POLKA and to the documented information. Furthermore, Sean required to establish a team with a large number of auditors, considering the size and the complexity of the organization. The top management of POLKA agreed with Sean ' s requirements.
The top management, in cooperation with Sean, assigned 10 more employees to the audit team. Following that. Sean planned the audit activities and assigned the roles and responsibilities to each auditor. They began by interviewing employees of different manufacturing departments to check whether they are aware of the process of the QMS implementation. While conducting these activities, one of the auditors asked Sean for permission to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis, as he was very familiar with the processes of the department.
Along the way, the teams findings showed that the staff were trained, documented information was updated, and the QMS fulfilled the requirements of ISO 9001. The internal audit took three weeks to complete, and on the last week the audit team held a final meeting The team shared their results and together drafted the audit report This report was submitted to the top management of the company. The report was maintained as documented information, and was available to the relevant interested parties.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Ten employees of POLKA were part of the audit team that conducted the internal audit. Is this acceptable?

• A. Yes, members of the company can join the internal audit team
• B. Yes, it is a requirement of ISO 9001 to include employees of the company in the internal audit
• C. No, ISO 9001 requires hiring a professional team of auditors who are not part of the company to conduct the internal audit

Who maintains ownership of the audit report?

• A. The certification body
• B. The auditee
• C. The audit team leader

(When raising a non-conformity during an audit, which two of the following items should you include in the non-conformity statement?)

• A. A description of or reference to audit criteria
• B. A target time to implement the corrective action
• C. Action the auditee has to implement to eliminate the non-conformity
• D. The name of the person (auditee) responsible for the non-conformity
• E. The name of the technical expert of the audit team that confirmed the existence of the non-conformity
• F. Relevant audit evidence

Scenario 3:
Fin-Pro is a financial institution in Austria offering commercial banking, wealth management, and investment services. The company faced a significant loss of customers due to failing to improve service quality as they expanded.
To regain customer confidence, top management implemented a QMS based on ISO 9001. After a year, they contacted ACB, a local certification body, to pursue ISO 9001 certification.
The audit team was led by Emilia, an experienced lead auditor, and included three auditors. After an agreement was reached, ACB sent the audit objectives to the audit team.
The audit team began by gathering information about Fin-Pro's understanding of ISO 9001 requirements.
While reviewing documented information, they noticed missing records of training and awareness sessions.
They conducted employee interviews to verify attendance.
The team also reviewed the organizational chart and job descriptions to confirm employee competence. They observed the company's working environment (social, psychological, and physical conditions).
The audit team analyzed the evidence and prepared an audit report with findings and conclusions.
ACB sent the audit objectives to the audit team after an agreement was reached. Is this acceptable?

• A. Yes, the audit objectives should be known only after an agreement is reached.
• B. No, the audit objectives should be part of the audit offer.
• C. No, only the auditee should know the audit objectives.
• D. Yes, as long as the audit team leader approves.

Select one of the options that best describes the purpose of conducting a document review:

• A. To reveal whether the documented system is nonconforming with audit criteria and to gather evidence to support the audit report.
• B. To detect any nonconformity of the system, if documented, with audit criteria and to identify information to support the audit plan.
• C. To confirm the conformity of the system, where documented, with audit criteria and to gather information to support the audit findings.
• D. To establish nonconformity in the documented system with audit criteria and to gather information to compile the audit report.
• E. To decide about the conformity of the documented system with audit standards and to gather findings to support the audit process.
• F. To determine the conformity of the system, as far as documented, with audit criteria and to gather information to support the audit activities.