最新のBIM_MGT_101問題集で試験を準備する

A regional user group raised awareness about a third-party add-on tool that enables a team to establish thresholds for model warnings. In addition, it automates suppressing warnings deemed negligible to a specific project.
Which two data points should a BIM manager gather to build a business case to have the tool approved for use across the firm? (Select two.)

• A. How many of the firm's competitors are already using the tool.
• B. The cost per user multiplied by the number of entire office staff, including the cost of time to implement and train on the tool.
• C. The reliability of the tool creator and the time to install, test, and create training materials on the tool.
• D. The language that available training materials on the tool are in.
• E. The relevant user group, the projected cost to supply the group, and the anticipated time savings and/or risk mitigation that the tool would provide.

解説: (JPTestKing メンバーにのみ表示されます)

A client has provided a resource model with many custom shared parameters required to meet the project data-management requirements across all of its projects with the firm. The BIM manager has extracted those parameters to the Parameters Service for wider firm access.
Which tool should a team member use to load the new shared parameters into a project model? (Select the correct tool on the image.)

For a project that is well into its Design Development phase, it is discovered that there is an easement on the property that increases the setback by 1 ft 6 in. (450 mm).
Which method for updating the geolocation of the project would be least disruptive to the extended design team?

• A. Specify coordinates at a point along the setback edge using the new data.
• B. Select all model elements in a 3D view and move them away from the increased setback boundary.
• C. Reposition the civil site property-boundary resource file, then publish the new position coordinates to the civil file.
• D. Reset coordinates, reposition the site property-boundary resource file, then acquire coordinates from the repositioned civil file.

解説: (JPTestKing メンバーにのみ表示されます)

A federated model has been created for a multidisciplinary project, but clashes are being reported in areas where coordination should already be resolved. Upon investigation, the BIM manager finds that some models were exported with outdated links and local coordinates.
What is the most appropriate next step before proceeding with coordination analysis?

• A. Instruct teams to verify model references and coordinate systems before reassembly.
• B. Notify the client and exclude the faulty models from further coordination.
• C. Freeze the current model state and ask trades to work around the identified issues.
• D. Run an additional clash-detection pass with adjusted tolerance thresholds to reduce clash totals.

When working with separate Revit templates for each discipline, which elements should be standardized to support collaboration and seamless coordination across the project?

• A. A coordinated set of title blocks, project units, specific view templates, and parameters that include both Project and Shared Parameters.
• B. A single template used across disciplines with shared settings, general workflows, and uniform file structure to simplify project setup and minimize variation.
• C. A blank or out-of-the-box Revit template with no predefined standards, requiring each designer to set up views, parameters, and content from scratch on every project.
• D. Individually developed templates with custom levels and grids, allowing each discipline to organize models based on its own internal requirements and modelling preferences.

解説: (JPTestKing メンバーにのみ表示されます)