最新のIEPPE問題集で試験を準備する

Mike is an OACETT C. Tech. He works for a municipal government in their infrastructure department. He is responsible for designing and approving the sewage and water management systems in new residential developments. Mike is currently revising the design for the sewage and water management system for a development that is six months behind schedule due to a series ofworker and materials shortages. The developer is also experiencing severe financial pressures, as a result of cost over runs caused by the shortages.
As he is revising the sewage and water management system designs, Mike notices a flaw in the water catchment system built around a small lake that is a key selling feature of the residential development. The design flaw means that, while the relevant standards are still met, in severe rainfall events the catchment system will be very susceptible to flooding. The flooding may in turn make the area dangerous for the residents using the park and recreational area around the lake. Mike brings this design flaw to the attention of his manager. His manager then schedules a meeting with the developer to discuss the design flaw. The developer indicates that the design cannot be changed due to budget constraints and existing commitments to the present design. Mike's manager then communicates this to Mike. He directs Mike to stamp the designs.
What should Mike do in this situation?
What is the main issue with respect to professional practice in this case?

• A. Negligence, an act or omission in the carrying out of the work of a practitioner that constitutes a failure to maintain the standards that a reasonable and prudent practitioner would maintain in the circumstances
• B. Failure to make reasonable provision for the safeguarding of life, health or property of a person who may be affected by the work for which the practitioner is responsible
• C. A breach of the Act or By-law, other than an action that is solely a breach of the Code of Ethics, or the Rules of Professional Conduct
• D. Conduct or an act relevant to the practice of engineering technology that, having regard to all the circumstances, would reasonably be regarded by technology professionals as disgraceful, dishonourable or unprofessional.

What is an inappropriate use of social media that is most likely to result in the termination of your employment?

• A. Posting a compliment about a colleague, manager, or employer.
• B. Posting confidential company or client information.
• C. Posting a picture of colleagues at a bar after work.
• D. Posting your family photos during work time.

Why is there a National Day of Mourning on April 28th?

• A. It was the day when the Ontario Workmen's Compensation Act was passed in the Ontario parliament.
• B. It was the day when the Ontario Workmen's Compensation Act was implemented in the Ontario parliament.
• C. It was the day when the Ontario Workmen's Compensation Act was given a third reading in the Ontario parliament, giving it final approval.
• D. It was the day when the Ontario Workmen's Compensation Act was changed in the Ontario parliament.

Why are soft skills important?

• A. Because getting along with colleagues is more important than doing good work.
• B. Because they enable meaningful interactions and build trust among colleagues.
• C. Because they make you appear easily influenced and therefore useful in a conflict.
• D. Because your employer is more likely to overlook your mistakes if you are likable.

Alex is an OACETT C.E.T. He works at an IT company that completes unique software programming for industrial and medical tools and equipment. There was sample hardware in the office that Alex did not think the company needed. He took the hardware home to see if he could adapt it for a project he was working on for his own interest. He did not intend to make money off of the project; he simply wanted to see if an idea he had was feasible. The next week the company owner asked all employees about the whereabouts of the sample hardware. The company owner indicated that the hardware needed to be returned to the manufacturer and that the company would get charged for it if it was not returned. Alex did not say anything to the company owner about having taken the sample hardware.
By this time, he had already disassembled it and used different parts in his own project. He was not able to put the sample hardware back together.
If the complaint goes all the way to the OACETT Discipline Committee, what is one possible consequence from the committee for Alex? (1 mark)

• A. They could have to pay the company owner for the cost of the hardware.
• B. They could have their membership in OACETT suspended or revoked.
• C. They could have to make the best effort, with the assistance of other OACETT members, to reconstruct the hardware and then return it to the company owner.
• D. They could lose their employment.